Huić and Peović quarreled, heavy accusations were made: 'You are a sociopathic political option!'
************************************************** ************************************************** ************************************************** ************* Tuz
t
Peović stated that Huić advocates cutting the public sector, and he advocates a campaign against entrepreneurs
****************************************
Comments on this blog
It is sad to hear two reformist parties arguing on the same topic!
The Workers' Front, which has been creeping along the same goat tracks of all reformist crimes, committed for the last 150 years, by united collaborations of CAPITAL AND LABOR, bypassing around, and then on the small door in remodifying the competitive Class Beasts stronger than the more powerless human being:
1. Consciously by circumventing the EU judiciary of questionable origin, - as a sacred and inviolable rule, by which both parties would keep in their own pockets, and which is later multiplied by the rule that the Devil always needs a bigger pile.
2. The complete removal from the minds of the Scientific Revolutionary Socialism of Marx, Engels and De leon, that the time has finally come for the theoretical realization of the technological conditions of economic and spiritual abundance for the whole human race.
3. By which the social revolution is effected by a one-time act of the civil ballot, - and is sent to the newsroom:
a / Class society,
b / The state as its service.
c / Like all coercive forces, its Army, Police and parasitic bureaucracy.
BECAUSE. WHEN A PUBLIC FOUNTAIN WAS ESTABLISHED, WHO NEEDS ITS OWNER, OUTSIDE THE CREATIVE MASSES, WHICH HAVE BEEN EXCAVATING ITS SEWERAGE FOR CENTURIES! ?
Davor Huić; Katarina Peović
Dragan Matic, Damjan Tadic / cropix
Katarina Peović from the Workers' Front, representative of the coalition We Can! - New Left - Workers' Front - WALNUT - Zagreb is ours - For the city and Davor Huić , representative of the coalition Smart, Focus, Party with name and surname discussed in the pre-election edition of the show Pressing N1 television about the direction of key public policies, private and public role of the state , market and private property.
N1: You have different views on how the state should be reformed. When they were able to make decisions - what kind of Croatia would they like to see in five years?
Peović: In my opinion, the framework of this issue is problematic because we need to stop giving prominent individuals the opportunity to change policy in terms of a handful of people who need to resolve all issues in the next term, we need to democratize the decision-making framework to include everyone.
We now have elites running their policies, not in favor of the majority. We are for Croatia, in the center of which live people who want to make a living from their work. In the run-up to the elections, everyone will say that we are for a more solidary and just society. Material lives were attacked by privatization, by cutting the welfare state. They go against the working, disenfranchised majority. It is important to involve citizens in the decision-making process, only by participating in decision-making can they begin to be responsible, we cannot delay this, competence is acquired through the process of democratization.
Huić: The key problem is that we lag behind other countries in development, we are the second poorest country in the EU. If we do not solve that, we will not solve the quality of life either, that is why the focus of our coalition is on starting our economy and potentials. We want lower taxes, local self-government reform ... All these policies have been implemented by our coalition panthers in Sveta Nedjelja, and successfully, we have a recipe and proof that it works.
What do you think about the example of St. Sunday?
Peović: This is a bad example, we cannot generalize it to Croatia, the policies advocated by Huić lead us where we are, cutting the public sector, this is represented by his political option. This is a vision of a society advocated by a clientelistic group that does not hide its connection to lobbyists, such lobbying groups have brought right-wing populists to power in South America. It is important to delineate what politics means for the majority.
Huić: I am not against the welfare state, I am in favor of increasing the efficiency of the public sector, especially in the administration. What is the problem with the example of St. Sunday? It is a city that has attracted investment, introduced public budget transparency, reduced administration. If you are against such a vision, what are you for? Except to seize the property of citizens. You proposed that, the confiscation of savings over 100 thousand euros, does that also apply to apartments?
What did you mean by that when you said you would take part of the savings in the fight against the crisis?
Peović: It is not surprising that I hear lies from this side. No one talked about the confiscation of property, it was said - redistribution, progressive taxation of the richest, we mentioned 100 thousand euros guaranteed by the state agency. We talked about the need for redistribution, the progressive taxation of the richest.
Huic: We need a country that will grow, create wealth for all citizens.
Did you say that it is necessary to include the accumulated wealth of those who do not use it?
Peović: There was talk of redistribution. It is specific and indicative that Huić is talking about representing the majority we want to take. They suck money from taxpayers, it is not symptomatic that he was also involved in Josipović's campaign, so he had to resign, let's not be naive.
Is Ms. Peovic lying?
Huić: He repeats lies, it is sad that you are telling. My two companies in the last 5 years have had a transfer of 6-7 percent of the share of revenue from state affairs, this does not justify attacks that I depend on state affairs. It is trying to criminalize honest entrepreneurial activity, is it illegal for a man to work with the state, go to tenders? Is it better not to have an entrepreneur?
Peović: Did you work with the Government of Tihomir Orešković and were an advisor, were you in a conflict of interest?
Huić: The picture you want to paint that my companies do business with the state, it is in a small and insignificant part.
Peovic: 2.3 million is not a small amount.
Huić: These are contracts that existed before. These are contracts 10-15 years older than that. You are trying to criminalize one ordinary business activity.
We are in a crisis period, 3 measures that you would take immediately?
Peovic: There are different positions - to create a government and to support the minority government, given our political strength, we will do everything to prevent the right-wing government, and then we would support the minority government of the SDP.
We would coordinate measures with partners, they would include raising the minimum wage, tax reform. In the long run, if we were in a situation to create policies at will, it is a policy of green reindustrialization, it is one of the necessary moves. We have been reduced to tourism and service activities, it is unsustainable. We would make an analysis of sectors that can attract other sectors, such as Đuro Đaković, and see which ancillary industries can be linked to them.
We need to have an industry that drives SMEs. We are limited by the rentier type of economy and imports.
Huić: You mentioned small and medium entrepreneurship, and he says that it is better when there are no entrepreneurs. In a crisis we need to do the things we propose, reduce the tax and administrative burden, open space for entrepreneurs to start a business and return to pre-crisis levels, we will have a recession of about 10 percent. It is important that there is no radical closure again as there has been for three months.
We would insist on introducing a level of transparency as in Sv. Sunday. Croatia has a high share of tourism in GDP, which is good in good times, not in crises. But Croatia does not depend as much on tourism as it is thought, merchandise exports grew by 50 percent. These are companies that have found market niches, Austrian, German chains have joined.
The perception is that in the public sector there are snobs, in the private capitalists?
Huić: Personally, I do not use the term uhljeb. We are thinking of a person who came to a fictitious job through party connections and is redundant. There is room for savings in the public sector, but we are not talking about a heart surgeon, teachers, pilots, police officers. We are not talking about people who create public goods and services, but those who do not.
Peović: Incitement to the public sector based on nothing, there are always sectors that are not functional. I mention Huić's statement in which he compares the entrepreneur with the status of Jews in Nazism, we hear this from this sociopathic option, they say that we will not endure lockdown, we would sacrifice the lives of those who are most exposed anyway and put medical staff first.
Huic: You are running a campaign against entrepreneurs. To me, it’s sociopathic.
Peovic: I never said that, you will not find what Huic is saying in my statement.
Is it necessary to reform the public sector?
Peović: The entire public sector is provisionally condemned, the problem is the clientelistic state that employs those with a party card. Huic is like that. I even think it’s fairer to have a party card and work with the state. Orešković takes you as an advisor to the Prime Minister and your company has a contract with that office. That raises suspicion. If you had a party card, it would be clearer to us which option you are serving.
Huic: The implication is wrong. Everything went through a public tender.
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar