If it is recognized
that property per se so completely dominates the possessor's mind , so
entirely determines his moral conduct and course of action, is it any wonder
that hatred and calumny fall to the lot of men who challenge, not merely contemporaneous
possession, but the very system that make possible the acquisition of property,
which, in toto, represent the non-commpensated labor of others ? And is it any wonder that Marx, above all
others, earned this hatred and
vilification – Marx, who established scientifically that the workers receives
in return for his labor only that part of his product required merely to
replace wasted tissues and the rags and
shelter required to cover and protect his body, and to insure a constant
progeny of wages slave? Unlike his predecessors and most of his contemporaries,
Marx did not merely declaim agaist the iniquity of the rich and deplore the
presence of the poor. He proved, with
facts, with logical reasoning, that one class, the capitalist class subsisted
on the labor o another class, the working class. By so doing Marx revealed the
prevailing system as a immoral system, and its beneficiaries as person who lived and flourished by the
commission of, or the concurrence in, an immoral act. Page 44,
by Arnold Petersen
www.severinomajkus.com
Nema komentara:
Objavi komentar